ドイツIPPNW医師が警告「首都圏は放射能汚染している」

ドイツIPPNW医師が警告「首都圏は放射能汚染している」



  公開日: 2012/11/30

2012年11月29日IPPNWシュトゥットガルト医師ヨルク・シュミット博士の講­演より抜粋

講演中使われている地図のソースは以下の通り：

"Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident"
im Fachmagazin „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States f America" (S. 19532)
http://www.pnas.org/content/108/49/19...

"Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion, and deposition"
im Fachmagazin "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics" (S. 2339)
http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/231...

また避難の必要な四県は福島、宮城、栃木、茨城で、
5.000Bq/kgの土壌汚染が報告されていることによる：
http://www.fukushima-disaster.de/file...

カテゴリ
ニュースと政治

＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝

http://www.pnas.org/content/108/49/19530.full.pdf+html?sid=15ee6e2e-f543-4da3-8004-4f30b71f8d02



以下抜粋：

Correction
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Correction for “Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident,” by Teppei J. Yasunari, Andreas Stohl, Ryugo S. Hayano, John F. Burkhart,
Sabine Eckhardt, and Tetsuzo Yasunari, which appeared in issue 49, December 6, 2011, of Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (108:19530–19534; first published November 14, 2011; 10.1073/pnas.1112058108).

 The authors note the following: “Due to the corrections on some of the observed daily 137Cs deposition numbers made by the MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology in Japan; available on the MEXT website in Japanese at http://radioactivity.mext.go.jp/ja/list/195/list-1.html) mainly at Kanagawa prefecture along with some minor corrections at other prefectures, the objectively estimated deposition values in the paper
have been revised by using the updated input data on the observed 137Cs deposition by MEXT.”

 The authors also note that on page 19530, left column, within the abstract, lines 22–23, “were estimated to be more than 5.6 and 1.0 PBq, respectively” should instead appear as “were estimated
to be approximately 6.7 and 1.3 PBq, respectively.” On page 19531, left column, second full paragraph, line 5, “(TRMM, 3B42 V6 product)” omitted the following references:

 On page 19531, right column, first full paragraph, lines 4–8, “Our estimates show that the area around NPP in Fukushima, secondarily effected areas (Miyagi and Ibaraki prefectures), and
other effected areas (Iwate, Yamagata, Tochigi, and Chiba prefectures) had 137Cs depositions of more than 100,000, 25,000, and 10,000 MBq km−2, respectively” should instead appear as “Our
estimate in Fig. 2A for the case of DRT of 0.005 showed that the area around the Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) in Fukushima, secondarily effected areas (Miyagi prefecture), and other effected
areas (Iwate, Yamagata, Tochigi, Ibaraki, and Chiba prefectures) had partially 137Cs depositions of more than 100,000, 50,000, and 10,000 MBq km−2, respectively.”

 On page 19531, right column, first full paragraph, lines 22–23, “on the similar order of the MEXT/DOE observations using a DRT value of 0.001 (Fig. S4)” should instead appear as “closer to the order of the MEXT/DOE observations around the NPP using a DRT value of 0.001 (Fig. S4)”.

 On page 19533, left column, first paragraph, lines 1–6, “some neighboring prefectures such as Miyagi, Tochigi, and Ibaraki are partially close to the limit under our upper bound estimate (Movie S4) and, therefore, local-scale exceedance is likely given the strong spatial variability of 137Cs deposition. For those three prefectures, detailed soil sampling is recommended in the near future” should instead appear as “some neighboring prefectures such as Iwate, Yamagata, Miyagi, Tochigi, and Ibaraki are partially close to the limit under the upper bound estimate with DRT of 0.001 (i.e., “the highest deposition estimate” in our estimates with
DRTs of 0.001–0.1) [using CCs of 38, 53, and 68 kg m−2 (Movie S4)] and, therefore, local-scale exceedance is likely given the strong spatial variability of 137Cs deposition. For those prefectures,
detailed soil sampling is recommended in the near future.”

On page 19533, left column, second full paragraph, line 1, “We estimate that a total of more than 5.6 and 1.0 PBq 137Cs” should instead appear as “We estimate that a total of approximately 6.7 and 1.3 PBq 137Cs”.

 On page 19533, left column, second full paragraph, line 9, “(Fig. 3)” should instead appear as “with DRT of 0.001 using CC of 53 kg m−2 (Fig. 3)”.

 On page 19533, left column, second full paragraph, lines 13– 15, “such as Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Niigata, Tochigi, Ibaraki, and Chiba, where values of more than 250 Bq kg−1 cannot be excluded (Fig. 3 and Movie S4)” should instead appear as “such as Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Niigata, Tochigi, Ibaraki, Chiba, etc., where values of more than 250 Bq kg−1 cannot be excluded for the estimated soil contaminations under the upper bound estimate on the deposition with DRT of 0.001 (i.e., “the highest deposition estimate” in our estimates with DRTs of 0.001-0.1) using CCs of 38, 53, and 68 kg m−2 (Fig. 3 and Movie S4)”.

 On page 19533, left column, second full paragraph, line 20 before “Therefore,” the following sentence should be added: “In addition, the spatiotemporally limited 137Cs deposition data by the MEXT observations were used in our estimates, which also included such as no measurements (Miyagi) and missing observations (Yamagata and Fukushima) for the time period in this study.”

 On page 19533, right column, first paragraph, lines 3–4, “Fukushima, March 18–March 26 and April 4; Gifu, March 24, 25, 27, 28, and 30; Nara, March 18–21 and April 15–18” should instead appear as “Fukushima, March 18–March 26; Gifu, March 24; Nara, March 18–20 and April 15–18”.

 On page 19533, right column, second full paragraph, line 18, “counting N on each day” should instead appear as “counting N on each day, for which unavailable, missing, and no detection on the observed depositions were all computationally treated as zero deposition”.
Last, the legends for Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4 appeared incorrectly.

 The figures and their corrected legends appear below. These
errors do not affect the conclusions of the article.

27. Huffman GJ (1997) Estimates of root-mean-square random error for finite samples
of estimated precipitation. J Appl Meteor 36:1191–1201.

28. Huffman GJ, et al. (2007) The TRMMmultisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): Quasiglobal,
multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J Hydrometeorol
8(1):38–55.

www.pnas.org PNAS Early Edition | 1 of 4
CORRECTION

以下省略

＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝

http://kingo999.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-1013.html

「早川マップは使えない」と言うドイツIPPNWのヨルク・シュミット博士

日本で一般的に使われている汚染地図（早川マップのことのようです）が、現実の汚染に即していないというのがIPPNWの結論で、様々な資料を検証し激論の末、彼らが一番信用できるとした地図が、この講演でも使われています。
IPPNWは、ニュースレター内でも「東京も含めた日本の広い地域が大変なセシウム汚染をしている」と断言しており、東京に汚染のないように見える早川マップは使えないと言うことです。
IPPNW（核戦争防止国際医師会議）：
核戦争を医療関係者の立場から防止する活動を行うための国際組織

ドイツIPPNWシュトゥットガルト支部の精神科医ヨルク・シュミット博士の講演の資料






シュミット博士の講演動画
IPPNW医師が警告する「首都圏は放射能汚染している」

論文"Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident" 専門誌 „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States f America“ (S. 19532)内に掲載
http://www.pnas.org/content/108/49/19530.full.pdf+html?sid=15ee6e2e-f543-4da3-8004-4f30b71f8d02

＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝