公開日: 2013/11/08
説明はありません。
========================================================
IEA Review Sweden 2013 / Panel discussion
公開日: 2013/02/06
========================================================
Sweden Solved its Nuclear Waste Problem, Why Can't We?
公開日: 2012/05/24
========================================================
========================================================
IEA Review Sweden 2013 / Panel discussion
公開日: 2013/02/06
Swedish energy policy 2013 - on the right track? Panel discussion
Panellist:
Svante Axelsson, General Secretary, Swedish Society for Nature Conservation
Jan Bertoft, General Secretary, Swedish consumer's association
Maria Sunér Fleming, Director Energy and Climate Policies, Swedish Confederation of Enterprises
Mats Holmberg, Head of Public Affairs, ABB Sweden
Birgitta Resvik, Vice President Corporate Relations, Fortum
Lennart Söder, Professor, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Urban Wästljung, Manager Sustainable transport, Scania
Annika Helker Lundström, CEO, Swedish Wind Energy Association
Panellist:
Svante Axelsson, General Secretary, Swedish Society for Nature Conservation
Jan Bertoft, General Secretary, Swedish consumer's association
Maria Sunér Fleming, Director Energy and Climate Policies, Swedish Confederation of Enterprises
Mats Holmberg, Head of Public Affairs, ABB Sweden
Birgitta Resvik, Vice President Corporate Relations, Fortum
Lennart Söder, Professor, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Urban Wästljung, Manager Sustainable transport, Scania
Annika Helker Lundström, CEO, Swedish Wind Energy Association
========================================================
Sweden Solved its Nuclear Waste Problem, Why Can't We?
公開日: 2012/05/24
Sweden Solved its Nuclear Waste Problem, Why Can't We?
Science and technology in America have been guided by the same set of ideas for more than half a century. The conventional wisdom is that if we feed more money and more scientists into our existing "knowledge enterprise" complex, society will derive proportionately more benefits. In the face of the global economic downturn, political disarray at the national level, and protracted challenges to the nation's public health, environmental quality, industrial base, and energy system, this simplistic assumption is long overdue for a reckoning. Today's challenges demand new ways of thinking about science and technology, and the government's role in advancing them. The problem, any honest inquiry will suggest, isn't always money, or the number of scientists, but the very way we do science.
Daniel Metlay
Senior Staff Member, Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board
Moderator
Lisa Margonelli - @NewAmerica
Director, Energy Policy Initiative, New America Foundation
http://www.newamerica.net/events/2012...
Science and technology in America have been guided by the same set of ideas for more than half a century. The conventional wisdom is that if we feed more money and more scientists into our existing "knowledge enterprise" complex, society will derive proportionately more benefits. In the face of the global economic downturn, political disarray at the national level, and protracted challenges to the nation's public health, environmental quality, industrial base, and energy system, this simplistic assumption is long overdue for a reckoning. Today's challenges demand new ways of thinking about science and technology, and the government's role in advancing them. The problem, any honest inquiry will suggest, isn't always money, or the number of scientists, but the very way we do science.
Daniel Metlay
Senior Staff Member, Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board
Moderator
Lisa Margonelli - @NewAmerica
Director, Energy Policy Initiative, New America Foundation
http://www.newamerica.net/events/2012...
========================================================
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿